Dr. David Bearman's Gold Standards
"Dr. Bearman's testimony was rambling and evasive. He had a poor command of the facts. Dr. Bearman did not disagree with Dr. MacDonald's [complainant's expert witness] opinions and admitted that Respondent deviated from the standard of care. He testified that the AACM guidelines and his standard of practice were the gold standards and that Respondent's deviations were minor, but offered insufficient evidence to establish that anything but the Medical Board Guidelines should be considered... having considered the facts in the foregoing paragraphs... Dr. MacDonald's testimony was more trustworthy than Dr. Bearman's" - Osteopathic Medical Board of California, in their ruling against Dr. Alfonso Jimenez.
Jimenez lost his medical license because he allowed this 'expert' to promote his bogus 'gold standards,' even after Bearman admitted that they fell short of the legal requirements.
Now, David Bearman is back at it again, promoting his 'gold standards' as those of the new American Academy of Cannabinoid Medicine. What makes him think that these legally-invalid and court-rejected standards will fare any different next time around? How many other doctors will lose their licenses at the hands of David Bearman's 'gold standards' before he ends up losing his?
What is the "Standard of Care" that the Medical Board Cites? Visit medpotcrisis.com/docs/practicestandards.html to find out.
Brought to you by medpotcrisis.com - committed to ensuring that Californians in medical need have access to competent and legal medical marijuana evaluations by doctors who believe in the appropriate standards of care, as defined by the California Medical Board